Regular readers (if any) will know I have the pleasure of a close, long-distance friendship with a righty blogger, Leucanthemum, who regularly challenges my temperament as I surely challenge hers. She writes a column for her local newspaper in Western Illinois, which she also posts online. I get her weekly email every Wednesday.
I also receive an email from the Dzogchen Foundation, founded by Lama Suryas Das. His goal, if I may paraphrase it, is to advance the teachings of the Dharma in the west, specifically in America, and bring compassion and reason back into our fractured, paranoid society. My weekly email is just one of the many ways he tries to improve humanity. Such are the Karmic convergences that I get both emails on the same day.
This week’s Dharma quote:
Johann von Goethe said that there were nine requisites for contented living:
Health enough to make work a pleasure. Wealth enough to support our needs. Strength to battle with difficulties and overcome them. Grace enough to confess your sins and forsake them. Patience enough to toil until some good is accomplished. Charity enough to see some good in your neighbor.
Love enough to move you to be useful and helpful to others. Faith enough to make real the things of God. Hope enough to remove all anxious fears of the future.
As you can see, he doesn’t always choose strictly from the Buddhist canon, which can be refreshing. Even for a dharma-phile, Buddhist texts tend to be obscure. Please re-read the above passage. We’re going to play compare-and-contrast.
Meanwhile in Friday’s Klips, my friend writes about gun laws around the world and emerging United Nations Policies. Please, read today’s offering. I could site the whole article, so concise is her writing, but instead I’ll snip the following:
While the rest of us were watching the brouhaha over the publication of classified information, while we were listening to high-ranking and high-visibility Americans “patriotically” insult their country, the United Nations had a major conference on gun control, claiming it was aimed “only at illegally owned weapons”, but not acknowledging that two of their primary humanitarian organizations, UNESCO and UNICEF have been actively campaigning — and funding campaigns — to outlaw firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens in places like Brazil. This they do by changing the definition of “law-abiding citizen”. They have already succeeded in effectively banishing lawful possession of firearms in Kenya by making the licensing for it so expensive and restrictive that only the very few socially, politically and financially connected elite can afford to own one by law. And, with violence commonplace in outlying areas, a Kenyan without a gun is likely to die quickly and savagely, often at the hands of neighboring, non-law-abiding Kenyans or Ugandans…
She packs a lot in here, playing to her audience of God-fearing gun-toters. She alludes to the Liberal indignation over banking record- and phone call-monitoring, to the tradition of openly criticizing America in hope of a better future (a distinctly Democratic process many believe should only be practiced when agreeing with the incumbent administration), and to the unstated belief of most Americans, right or left, that we hold the Golden Key of TRUTH, and that the world should listen only to us – especially the United Nations. Then she goes forth to enflame a Righty fear of firearm confiscation, as if what is happening outside the US can be measured by the yardstick of our cultural biases. Or can be fairly represented by a 300-word essay. In this one powerful paragraph she fans the flames of derision, division, and fear.
I see no sign of “Love enough to move you to be useful and helpful to others”; No nod to “Faith enough to make real the things of God”; although I assume much of her readership considers themselves devout Christians; no allusion to “Hope enough to remove all anxious fears of the future”. Her stereotypical conservative view does very little to better the world, and much to fracture it.
What I’m trying to illustrate is the dichotomy of thought between modern American ideals and a suppressed religious (for lack of a better term) tradition older than Christianity that aims unerringly toward the betterment of humanity. They are literally worlds apart. While the first snippet reminds us that even in the West, attempts were made at compassionate thought, yet today, they have been thoroughly stifled.
On a person level, such disparity of messages causes many struggles in my mind: while my heart-and-soul – eternal bastion of the Liberal-minded, and endless target for derision by the Right – tells me that happiness lies in the well-being of others, I am constantly bombarded with hate-speak via inescapable media outlets of all camps. Some days I feel my head wanting to explode (figuratively speaking, of course).
Such is the dilemma of a 21st Century Dharma practitioner.